ปัจจัยที่มีผลต่อการพิมพ์รากฟันเทียมแบบดิจิทัลโดยใช้สแกนบอดี้ ร่วมกับเครื่องสแกนในช่องปาก: การทบทวนวรรณกรรม
Factors Affecting Accuracy of Digital Dental Implant Impression Using Scanbody and intraoral Scanner: Review Literature
Keywords:
การพิมพ์รากฟันเทียมแบบดิจิทัล, เครื่องสแกนในช่องปาก, สแกนบอดี้, Digital implant impression, Intraoral scanner, ScanbodyAbstract
สแกนบอดี้เป็นอุปกรณ์ที่ใช้ต่อเข้ากับส่วนรากฟันเทียมที่ฝังลงในกระดูกโดยใช้งานร่วมกับเครื่องสแกน ในช่องปากเพื่อการพิมพ์รากฟันเทียมแบบดิจิทัล การศึกษาถึงความแม่นยำของการพิมพ์รากฟันเทียมแบบดิจิทัล นิยมศึกษาจากความแม่นยำของสแกนบอดี้ซึ่งเป็นตัวถ่ายทอดตำแหน่งและมุมของรากฟันเทียม จากการทบทวน วรรณกรรมพบว่า การออกแบบ วัสดุที่ใช้ทำสแกนบอดี้ ชนิดของเครื่องสแกนในช่องปาก ระบบซอฟต์แวร์ ระดับ ความสูง ความเอียง ระยะห่าง และตำแหน่งของรากฟันเทียม สภาวะแวดล้อมในการสแกนรวมถึงผู้สแกนมีผลต่อ ความแม่นยำในการพิมพ์รากฟันเทียมแบบดิจิทัล บทความปริทัศน์นี้มีวัตถุประสงค์เพื่อกล่าวถึงวิธีการพิมพ์ รากฟันเทียมแบบดิจิทัลโดยการใช้สแกนบอดี้ร่วมกับเครื่องสแกนในช่องปาก และปัจจัยที่ส่งผลต่อความแม่นยำ เพื่อให้เกิดประโยชน์ในการใช้งานทางคลินิกต่อไป Abstract: A scanbody is a device attached to a dental implant fixture and is used in conjunction with an intraoral scanner for digital implant impressions. Studies that investigate the accuracy of digital implant impression often focus on the position of the scanbody, which represents the position and angulation of the implant fixture. Literature reviews indicate that factors such as the design and materials of the scanbody, types of intraoral scanners, software system, the level, inclination, distance, and position of dental implants, the scanning environment, and the operator’s skill can affect the accuracy of digital dental implant impressions. The objective of this review article is to provide an overview of method for digital dental implant impression using scanbody and intraoral scanner, as well as to discuss the factors that can impact accuracy, for further advancements in clinical applications.Downloads
References
Marques S, Ribeiro P, Falcão C, Lemos BF, Ríos-Carrasco B, Ríos-Santos JV, et al. Digital impressions in implant dentistry: a literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(3):1020. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031020.
Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B. Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(3):343-52.
Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100(4):285-91.
Joda T, Wittneben JG, Brägger U. Digital implant impressions with the “Individualized Scanbody Technique” for emergence profile support. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(3):395-7.
Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpelä A, Mäkynen A. Recent advances in dental optics–Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2014;54:203-21.
Henprasert P, Dawson DV, El-Kerdani T, Song X, Couso-Queiruga E, Holloway JA. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position using surgical guides fabricated by additive and subtractive techniques. J Prosthodont.2020;29(6):534-41.
Papaspyridakos P, Vazouras K, Chen YW, Kotina E, Natto Z, Kang K, et al. Digital vs Conventional implant impressions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(8):660-78.
Michelinakis G, Apostolakis D,Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Özcan M. The direct digital workflow in fixed implant prosthodontics: a narrative review. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12903021-01398-2.
Albanchez-González MI, Brinkmann JC, Peláez-Rico J, López-Suárez C, Rodríguez-Alonso V, Suárez García MJ. Accuracy of digital dental implants impression taking with intraoral scanners compared with conventional impression techniques: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(4):2026. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042026.
Sobczak B, Majewski P. An integrated fully digital prosthetic workflow for the immediatefull-arch restoration of edentulous patients-a case report. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(7):4126. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074126.
Lorenzetti M, Lorenzetti V, Carossa M, Cavagnetto D, Mussano F. Using a preoperative scan digital impression and a digital index to build immediate interim full-arch implant-supported prosthesis. A case report and proof of concept. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(3):996. doi:10.3390/app11030996.
Schmidt A, Wöstmann B, Schlenz MA. Accuracy of digital implant impressions in clinical studies: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022;33(6):573-85.
Lawand G, Ismail Y, Revilla-León M, Tohme H. Effect of implant scan body geometric modifications on the trueness and scanning time of complete arch intraoral implant digital scans: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.06.004.
Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, Wismeijer DW. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(3):186-94.
Arcuri L, Pozzi A, Lio F, Rompen E, Zechner W, Nardi A. Influence of implant scanbody material, position and operator on the accuracy of digital impression for complete-arch: A randomized in vitro trial. J Prosthodont Res. 2020;64(2):128-36.
Lee JH, Bae JH, Lee SY. Trueness of digital implant impressions based on implant angulation and scan body materials. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):21892. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-01442-9.
Diker E, Terzioglu H, Gouveia DNM, Donmez MB, Seidt J, Yilmaz B. Effect of material type, torque value, and sterilization on linear displacements of a scan body: An in vitro study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023;25(2):419-25.
Kim J, Son K, Lee KB. Displacement of scan body during screw tightening: A comparative in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020;12(5):307-15.
Stimmelmayr M, Güth JF, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Beuer F. Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit--an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(3):851-6.
Arcuri L, Lio F, Campana V, Mazzetti V, Federici FR, Nardi A, Galli M. Influence of implant scanbody wear on the accuracy of digital impression for complete-arch: a randomized in vitro trial. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(3):927. doi: 10.3390/ma15030927.
Fluegge T, Att W, Metzger M, Nelson K. A novel method to evaluate precision of optical implant impressions with commercial scan bodiesan experimental approach. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(1):34-41.
Sawyers J, Baig MR, El-Masoud B. Effect of multiple use of impression copings and scanbodies on implant cast accuracy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34(4):891-8.
Mangano F, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Imburgia M, Mangano C, Admakin O. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: A comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0792-7.
Kim RJY, Benic G, Park J-M. Trueness of ten intraoral scanners in determining the positions of simulated implant scan bodies. Scientific Reports. 20221;11(1):2606. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-82218-z.
Flügge TV, Att W, Metzger MC, Nelson K. Precision of dental implant digitization using intraoral scanners. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29(3):277-83.
Mangano FG, Admakin O, Bonacina M, Lerner H, Rutkunas V, Mangano C. Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):263. doi:10.1186/s12903-020-01254-9.
Kim RJ, Benic GI, Park JM. Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0222070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222070.
Kanjanasavitree P, Thammajaruk P, Guazzato M. Comparison of different artificiallandmarks and scanning patterns on the completearch implant intraoral digital scans. J Dent. 2022;125:104266. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104266.
Sequeira V, Harper MT, Lilly CL, Bryington MS. Accuracy of digital impressions at varying implant depths: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont. 2023;32(1):54-61.
Nam N-E, Shin S-H, Lim J-H, Lee B-R, Shim J, Kim J-E. Accuracy of implant position reproduction according to exposed length of the scan body during optical scanning: an in vitro study. Applied Sciences. 2021;11:1689. doi: org/10.3390/app11041689.
Laohverapanich K, Luangchana P, Anunmana C, Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S. Different implant subgingival depth affects the trueness and precision of the 3d dental implant position: a comparative in vitro study among five digital scanners and a conventional technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021;36(6):1111-20.
Lin WS, Harris BT, Elathamna EN, Abdel-Azim T, Morton D. Effect of implant divergence on the accuracy of definitive casts created from traditional and digital implant-level impressions: an in vitro comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30(1):102-9.
Ciocca L, Meneghello R, Monaco C, Savio G, Scheda L, Gatto MR, et al. In vitro assessment of the accuracy of digital impressions prepared using a single system for full-arch restorations on implants. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018;13(7):1097-108.
Thanasrisuebwong P, Kulchotirat T, Anunmana C. Effects of inter-implant distance on the accuracy of intraoral scanner: An in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2021;13(2):107-16.
Ochoa-López G, Cascos R, Antonaya-Martín JL, Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans. J Dent. 2022;121:104138. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104138.
Moslemion M, Payaminia L, Jalali H, Alikhasi M. Do type and shape of scan bodies affect accuracy and time of digital implant impressions?. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2020;28(1):18-27.
Revilla-León M, Kois DE, Kois JC. A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans: Part 2 Patient factors. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;35(1):241-9.
Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, Viguie G, Viennot S, Robinson P, et al. Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:8427595. doi: 10.1155/2017/8427595.
Amornvit P, Rokaya D, Peampring C, Sanohkan S. Confocal 3D optical intraoral scanners and comparison of image capturing accuracy. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2021;66(1):303-14.
Revilla-León M, Kois DE, Kois JC. A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans. Part 1: Operator factors. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;35(1):230-40.
Schmidt A, Schlenz M, Liu H, Kämpe H, Wöstmann B. The Influence of Hard-and Software Improvement of Intraoral Scanners on the Implant Transfer Accuracy from 2012 to 2021: An In Vitro Study. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(15):7166. doi:10.3390/app11157166.
Mangano F, Lerner H, Margiani B, Solop I, Latuta N, Admakin O. Congruence between Meshes and Library Files of Implant Scanbodies: An In Vitro Study Comparing Five Intraoral Scanners. J Clin Med. 2020;9(7):2174. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072174.
Park SW, Choi YD, Lee DH. The effect of the improperly scanned scan body images on the accuracy of virtual implant positioning in computer-aided design software. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020;12(3):107-113.
Park S, Suh S, Kim H, Lee D, Lee SY, Jang W, Park C. New Scanning Strategy for More Accurate Implant Scanbody Alignment: Short Communication. Int J Prosthodont. 2023;36(1):71-3.
Gómez-Polo M, Sallorenzo A, Ortega R, Gómez-Polo C, Barmak AB, Att W, et al. Influence of implant angulation and clinical implant scan body height on the accuracy of complete arch intraoral digital scans. J Prosthet Dent. 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.018.
Marques VR, Çakmak G, Yilmaz H, Abou-Ayash S, Donmez MB, Yilmaz B. Effect of scanned area and operator on the accuracy of dentate arch scans with a single implant. J Clin Med. 2022;11(14).4125. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144125.
Revilla-León M, Subramanian SG, Özcan M, Krishnamurthy VR. Clinical study of the influence of ambient light scanning conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of an intraoral scanner. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(2):107-13.
Revilla-León M, Gohil A, Barmak AB, Gómez-Polo M, Pérez-Barquero JA, Att W, et al. Influence of ambient temperature changes on intraoral scanning accuracy. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;130(5):755-60.
Choi YD, Lee KE, Mai HN, Lee DH. Effects of scan body exposure and operator on the accuracy of image matching of implant impressions with scan bodies. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124(3):379.e1-6.
Revell G, Simon B, Mennito A, Evans ZP, Renne W, Ludlow M, et al. Evaluation of complete-arch implant scanning with 5 different intraoral scanners in terms of trueness and operator experience. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(4):632-8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Srinakharinwirot University Dental Journal (E-ISSN 2774-0811)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
เจ้าของบทความต้องมอบลิขสิทธิ์ในการตีพิมพ์แก่วิทยาสาร โดยเขียนเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรแนบมาพร้อมบทความที่ส่งมาตีพิมพ์ ตามแบบฟอร์ม "The cover letter format" รวมทั้งต้องมีลายมือชื่อของผู้เขียนทุกท่านรับรองว่าบทความดังกล่าวส่งมาตีพิมพ์ที่วิทยาสารนี้แห่งเดียวเท่านั้น
