Tooth Transplantation Using Computer-Aided Rapid Prototyping Model Compared to Conventional Technique (A Pilot Study)
Keywords:
Tooth transplantation, Computer-aided Rapid prototyping, CARP modelAbstract
Objective: This research study aimed to compare the efficiency between tooth transplantation using the Computer-aided rapid prototyping model (CARP model) and a conventional tooth transplantation technique. Materials & Methods: Ten patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. Five patients were performed tooth transplantation using the CARP technique (study group) and other five patients were performed antotransplantation using the conventional technique (controlled group). During transplantation, operation time, extra-alveolar time, and attempt of fitting donor tooth to recipient site were evaluated. Moreover, after 3 months post-operation, PDL space, tooth mobility, and pocket depth were examined. Result: During transplantation, the study group consumed lower operating time and extraalveolar time compared to the control group although no statistic significance was found (p = 0.086 and p = 0.05 respectively). In addition, the study group showed significantly fewer attempts to fit the donor tooth to the recipient socket compared to the control group (p = 0.019). After 3 months post-transplantation, average PDL width shows a narrower significant difference in the study group compared to the control group (p = 0.014). Moreover, the study group showed significantly better pocket depth reduction compared to the control group (p = 0.024). No significant difference found in tooth mobility after tooth transplantation in both groups (p = 0.074). Conclusion: CARP technique reduced attempt to fitting donor tooth and improved PDL healing of donor tooth in tooth transplantation compared to conventional technique.Downloads
References
Kim K, Choi HS, Pang NS. Clinical application of 3D technology for tooth autotransplantation: A case report. Aust Endod J.2019;45(1):122–8.
Anssari Moin D, Derksen W, Verweij JP, van Merkesteyn R, Wismeijer D. A novel approach for computer-assisted template-guided autotransplantation of teeth with custom 3D designed/printed surgical tooling. An ex vivo proof of concept. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(5):895–902.
Cross D, El-Angbawi A, McLaughlin P, Keightley A, Brocklebank L, Whitters J, et al. Developments in autotransplantation of teeth. Surgeon. 2013;11(1):49–55.
Waldon K, Barber SK, Spencer RJ, Duggal MS. Indications for the use of auto-transplantation of teeth in the child and adolescent. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2012;13(4):210–6.
] Mendes RA, Rocha G. Mandibular third molar autotransplantation--literature review with clinical cases. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004;70(11):761–6.
Park JH, Tai K, Hayashi D. Tooth autotransplantation as a treatment option: a review. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010;35(2):129–35.
Andreasen JO, Paulsen HU, Yu Z, Ahlquist R, Bayer T, Schwartz O. A long-term study of 370 autotransplanted premolars. Part I. Surgical procedures and standardized techniques for monitoring healing. Eur J Orthod. 1990;12(1):3–13.
Nethander G. Periodontal conditions of teeth autogenously transplanted by a two-stage technique. J Periodontal Res. 1994;29(4):250–8.
Lee S-J. Clinical application of computeraided rapid prototyping for tooth transplantation. Aust Endod J. 2004;30(1):29–31.
Verweij JP, Moin DA, Mensink G, Nijkamp P, Wismeijer D, van Merkesteyn JPR. Autotransplantation of premolars with a 3-dimensional printed titanium replica of the donor tooth functioning as a surgical guide: Proof of concept. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(6):1114–9.
Verweij JP, Anssari Moin D, Wismeijer D, van Merkesteyn JPR. Replacing heavily damaged teeth by third molar autotransplantation with the use of cone-beam computed tomography and rapid prototyping. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75(9):1809–16.
Souza VH, Matsuda RH, Peres ASC, Amorim PHJ, Moraes TF, Silva JVL, et al. Development and characterization of the InVesalius Navigator software for navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci Methods. 2018;309:109–20.
Moin DA, Hassan B, Parsa A, Mercelis P, Wismeijer D. Accuracy of preemptively constructed, cone beam CT-, and CAD/CAM technology-based, individual Root Analogue Implant technique: an in vitro pilot investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(5):598–602.
Pettis B, France AK, Shergill J. Getting started with MakerBot: A hands-on introduction to affordable 3D printing. 1st ed. Sebastopol, CA: Maker Media; 2012. 213 p.
Andreasen JO. Effect of extra-alveolar period and storage media upon periodontal and pulpal healing after replantation of mature permanent incisors in monkeys. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10(1):43–53.
Vilhjálmsson VH, Knudsen GC, Grung B, Bårdsen A. Dental auto-transplantation to anterior maxillary sites: Dental auto-transplantation to upper anterior sites. Dent Traumatol. 2011;27(1):23–9.
Akhlef Y, Schwartz O, Andreasen JO, Jensen SS. Autotransplantation of teeth to the anterior maxilla: A systematic review of survival and success, aesthetic presentation and patientreported outcome. Dent Traumatol. 2018;34(1):20–7.
Day PF, Kindelan SA, Spencer JR, Kindelan JD, Duggal MS. Dental trauma: part 2. Managing poor prognosis anterior teeth—treatment options for the subsequent space in a growing patient. J Orthod. 2008;35(3):143–55.
Tsukiboshi M. Autotransplantation of teeth: requirements for predictable success. Dent Traumatol. 2002;18(4):157–80.
Gupta S, Goel M, Sachdeva G, Sharma B, Malhotra D. Autotransplantation. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18(6):500–3.
Verweij JP, van Westerveld KJH, Anssari Moin D, Mensink G, van Merkesteyn JPR. Autotransplantation with a 3-dimensionally printed replica of the donor tooth minimizes extra-alveolar time and intraoperative fitting attempts: A multicenter prospective study of 100 transplanted teeth. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78(1):35–43.
Verweij JP, Toxopeus EE, Fiocco M, Mensink G, van Merkesteyn JPR. Success and survival of autotransplanted premolars and molars during short-term clinical follow-up. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43(2):167–72.
Lee S-J, Kim E. Minimizing the extraoral time in autogeneous tooth transplantation: use of computer-aided rapid prototyping (CARP) as a duplicate model tooth. Restor Dent Endod. 2012;37(3):136–41.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Srinakharinwirot University Dental Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
เจ้าของบทความต้องมอบลิขสิทธิ์ในการตีพิมพ์แก่วิทยาสาร โดยเขียนเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรแนบมาพร้อมบทความที่ส่งมาตีพิมพ์ ตามแบบฟอร์ม "The cover letter format" รวมทั้งต้องมีลายมือชื่อของผู้เขียนทุกท่านรับรองว่าบทความดังกล่าวส่งมาตีพิมพ์ที่วิทยาสารนี้แห่งเดียวเท่านั้น
