Fabrication and Clinical Evaluation of a Novel 3D printed Hydroxyapatite/Polycaprolactone Composite (Novel 3DP HA/ PCL) for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Preliminary Study
Keywords:
Polycaprolactone, Augment bone graft, Hydroxyapatite,, Bone densityAbstract
Objective: To fabricate a 3DP hydroxyapatite/polycaprolactone composite graft material and assess its clinical efficacy in maxillary sinus augmentation through a preliminary assessment of bone density changes over a one-year period, compared to deproteinized bovine bone mineral graft. Methods: A 3DP hydroxyapatite/polycaprolactone (HA/PCL) composite was fabricated using 3D printing of calcium sulfate-based material, followed by phase transformation and PCL infiltration. The composite was characterized through SEM, XRD, micro-CT, and compression testing. In a clinical study, 3DP HA/PCL composite material was compared with deproteinized bovine bone graft in sinus augmentation procedures. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to measure bone density at baseline, 6 months, and 1-year post-operation. Results: SEM and micro-CT analyses revealed that the 3DP HA/PCL composite exhibited a highly porous, three-dimensional architecture with HA crystals combined with PCL. The microstructure was characterized by a mixture of spherical and irregular-shaped particles with 60.67% porosity. Compression testing demonstrated that the 3DP HA/PCL composite granules had a compressive load resistance of 7.55 ± 1.71 N. The calculated compressive strength of the granule was approximately 2.4 MPa. CBCT analysis of bone density changes revealed distinct patterns between the two groups. Significant differences in graft bone density were observed in the control group at all time points (P < 0.05) , while the 3DP HA/PCL group demonstrated no significant changes (P < 0.3831). However, between 6 months to 1 year, the 3DP HA/PCL group exhibited an increased bone density gain trend similar to the rate observed in the xenograft group. At 1 year, the increase in bone density from T1 to T3 was significant in both the control and test groups., These findings indicate that while 3DP HA/PCL grafts initially increase bone density more slowly than xenografts, they demonstrate a more pronounced gain in the later phase compared to the early phase. Conclusion: Based on the promising preliminary results from the sinus augmentation study, 3DP HA/PCL composite demonstrates potential as an alternative bone graft material to deproteinized bovine bone mineral.Downloads
References
Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29(Suppl 3):197-212; discussion 32-3.
Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003;23(4):313-23.
Goncalves SB, Correia J, Costa AC. Evaluation of dental implants using Computed Tomography. 2013 IEEE 3rd Portuguese Meeting in Bioengineering (ENBENG). 2013:1-4. doi:10.1109/ENBENG.2013.6518387.
Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980;38(8):613-6.
Misch CE. Maxillary sinus augmentation for endosteal implants: organized alternative treatment plans. Int J Oral Implantol. 1987;4(2):49-58.
Danesh-Sani SA, Loomer PM, Wallace SS. A comprehensive clinical review of maxillary sinus floor elevation: anatomy, techniques, biomaterials and complications. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;54(7):724-30.
Lie SAN, Claessen RMMA, Leung CAW, Merten HA, Kessler PAWH. Non-grafted versus grafted sinus lift procedures for implantation in the atrophic maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;51(1):122-32.
Rickert D, Slater JJRH, Meijer HJA, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Maxillary sinus lift with solely autogenous bone compared to a combination of autogenous bone and growth factors or (solely) bone substitutes. a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41(2):160-7.
Cardoso CL, Curra C, Santos PL, Rodrigues MFM, Ferreira-Júnior O, de Carvalho PSP. Current considerations on bone substitutes in maxillary sinus lifting. Revista Clínica de Periodoncia, Implantología y Rehabilitación Oral. 2016;9(2):102-7.
Ginebra MP, Espanol M, Maazouz Y, Bergez V, Pastorino D. Bioceramics and bone healing. EFORT Open Rev. 2018;3(5):173-83.
Kattimani VS, Kondaka S, Lingamaneni KP. Hydroxyapatite–-Past, Present, and Future in Bone Regeneration. Bone and Tissue Regeneration Insights. 2016;7. doi:10.4137/BTRI.S36138
Zhao R, Xie P, Zhang K, Tang Z, Chen X, Zhu X, et al. Selective effect of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on osteoporotic and healthy bone formation correlates with intracellular calcium homeostasis regulation. Acta Biomater. 2017;59:338-50. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.009.
LeGeros RZ. Calcium phosphate-based osteoinductive materials. Chem Rev. 2008;108(11):4742-53.
Zhiwei J, Bin L, Shengyi X, Haopeng M, Yuan Y, Weimin Y. 3D printing of HA / PCL composite tissue engineering scaffolds. Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research. 2019;2(4):196-202.
Stevanovic S, Chavanne P, Braissant O, Pieles U, Gruner P, Schumacher R. Improvement of mechanical properties of 3d printed hydroxyapatite scaffolds by polymeric infiltration. Bioceram. Dev. Appl. 2013;3:10-2. doi: 10.4172/2090-5025.S1-012.
Kim BS, Yang SS, Park H, Lee SH, Cho YS, Lee J. Improvement of mechanical strength and osteogenic potential of calcium sulfate-based hydroxyapatite 3-dimensional printed scaffolds by ε-polycarbonate coating. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2017;28(13):1256-70.
BaoLin G, Ma PX. Synthetic biodegradable functional polymers for tissue engineering: a brief review. Sci China Chem. 2014;57(4):490-500.
Taecha-Apaikun K, Pisek P, Suwanprateeb J, Thammarakcharoen F, Arayatrakoollikit U, Angwarawong T, et al. In vitro resorbability and granular characteristics of 3D-printed hydroxyapatite granules versus allograft, xenograft, and alloplast for alveolar cleft surgery applications. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2021;235(11):1288-96.
Suwanprateeb J, Thammarakcharoen F, Hobang N. Enhancement of Mechanical Properties of 3D printed Hydroxyapatite by Combined Low and High Molecular Weight Polycaprolactone Sequential Infiltration. J. Mater. Sci. 570 Mater. Med. 2016;27(11):171. doi: 10.1007/s10856-016-5784-4.
Hemstapat R, Suwanprateeb J, Sriwatananukulkit O, Luangwattanawilai T, Desclaux SS. Study of bone regeneration of a porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds infiltrated with polycaprolactone and polycaprolactone membrane in a rat model. [Study report: Sponsored by the National Metal and Materials Technology Center] Bangkok: Department of Pharmacology, Mahidol University; 2019.
Suwanprateeb J, Thammarakcharoen F, Wasoontararat K, Suvannapruk W. Influence of printing parameters on the transformation efficiency of 3D‐printed plaster of paris to hydroxyapatite and its properties. Rapid Prototyping J. 2012;18(6):490-9.
Kijartorn P, Thammarakcharoen F, Suwanprateeb J, Buranawat B. The use of three dimensional printed hydroxyapatite granules in alveolar ridge preservation. Key Eng Mater. 2017;751:663–7. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.751.663.
Thammarakcharoen F, Suwanprateeb J. Effect of process parameters on biomimetic deposition of calcium phosphate on 3D printed hydroxyapatite. Key Eng Mater. 2017;751:599–604.
Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharmaceutical Statistics. 2005;4(4):287-91.
Suwanprateeb J, Suvannapruk W, Wasoontararat K. Low temperature preparation of calcium phosphate structure via phosphorization of 3D-printed calcium sulfate hemihydrate based material. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21(2):419-29.
Kijartorn P, Wongpairojpanich J, Thammarakcharoen F, Suwanprateeb J, Buranawat B. Clinical evaluation of 3D printed nano-porous hydroxyapatite bone graft for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled trial. J Dent Sci. 2022;17(1):194-203.
Mekcha P, Wongpairojpanich J, Thammarakcharoen F, Suwanprateeb J, Buranawat B. Customized 3D printed nanohydroxyapatite bone block grafts for implant sites: A case series. J Prosthodont Res. 2023;67(2):311-320.
Suwanprateeb J, Thammarakcharoen F, Hobang N. Enhancement of mechanical properties of 3D printed hydroxyapatite by combined low and high molecular weight polycaprolactone sequential infiltration. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016;27(11):171. doi:10.1007/s10856-016-5784-4.
Loh QL, Choong C. Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2013;19(6):485-502.
Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2005;26(27):5474-91.
Ferraz MP. Bone Grafts in Dental Medicine: An Overview of Autografts, Allografts and Synthetic Materials. Materials (Basel). 2023;16(11):4117. doi: 10.3390/ma16114117.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Srinakharinwirot University Dental Journal (E-ISSN 2774-0811)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
เจ้าของบทความต้องมอบลิขสิทธิ์ในการตีพิมพ์แก่วิทยาสาร โดยเขียนเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรแนบมาพร้อมบทความที่ส่งมาตีพิมพ์ ตามแบบฟอร์ม "The cover letter format" รวมทั้งต้องมีลายมือชื่อของผู้เขียนทุกท่านรับรองว่าบทความดังกล่าวส่งมาตีพิมพ์ที่วิทยาสารนี้แห่งเดียวเท่านั้น