Agreement and Reliability of An Endodontic Motor with Integrated Electronic Apex Locators During Gutta-Percha Retrieval: An Ex Vivo Comparative Study

Authors

  • Pamornauckakate Saikaew Department of Conservative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Srinakharinwirot University Bangkok 10110, Thailand.
  • Suwit Wimonchit Department of Conservative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Srinakharinwirot University Bangkok 10110, Thailand.

Keywords:

Electronic apex locator, Retreatment, Tri Auto ZX2®, VDW.GOLD® RECIPROC®, Working length determination

Abstract

Objective: This ex vivo study evaluated the agreement and reliability of two endodontic motors with integrated electronic apex locators, Tri Auto ZX2® and VDW.GOLD® RECIPROC®, for canal length measurement during gutta-percha retrieval. Materials and Methods: Thirty extracted maxillary premolars were prepared with occlusal reduction to create a flat reference surface, and standard endodontic procedures were performed. Before obturation, canal length was determined by inserting a file to 0.5 mm short of the apical foramen, defined as the “actual length” (AL). The specimens were embedded in an experimental acrylic model using alginate. After obturation, canal length was remeasured during gutta-percha retrieval using the two tested devices at the 1.0 and 0.5 marks. Differences between measurements were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test, while agreement and reliability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman analysis. Results: For both endodontic motors, measurements at the 1.0 mark were closer to the AL and showed a statistically significant difference compared with those at the 0.5 mark. The ICC indicated good reliability for measurements at the 1.0 mark in both devices, with values around 0.87. Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated that the measurements were within acceptable limits of agreement, with minimal dispersion at the 1.0 mark. Conclusions: The 1.0 mark setting of both Tri Auto ZX2® and VDW.GOLD® RECIPROC® provided better agreement in canal length measurements during gutta-percha retrieval and may help reduce the risk of overinstrumentation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Pamornauckakate Saikaew, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Srinakharinwirot University Bangkok 10110, Thailand.

(First author)

Suwit Wimonchit, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Srinakharinwirot University Bangkok 10110, Thailand.

(Corresponding author)

References

Taintor JF, Ingle JI, Fahid A. Retreatment versus further treatment. Clin Prev Dent. 1983;5(5):8-14.

Gorni FG, Gagliani MM. The outcome of endodontic retreatment: a 2-yr follow-up. J Endod. 2004;30(1):1–4.

Stabholz A, Friedman S. Endodontic retreatment--case selection and technique. Part 2: Treatment planning for retreatment. J Endod.1988;14(12):607-14.

Sjogren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 1990;16(10):498–504.

Pascon EA, Marrelli M, Congi O, Ciancio R, Miceli F, Versiani MA. An in vivo comparison of working length determination of two frequency based electronic apex locators. Int Endod J. 2009;42(11):1026-31.

Jung IY, Yoon BH, Lee SJ, Lee SJ. Comparison of the reliability of “0.5” and “APEX” mark measurements in two frequency-based electronic apex locators. J Endod. 2011;37(1):49–52.

Duh BR. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of Root ZX series electronic apex locators. J Dent Sci. 2009;4(2):75–80.

Alothmani OS, Siddiqui AY. Accuracy of Root ZX electronic apex locator in relation to two different employment protocols: An in vitro study. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e44659. doi:10.7759/cureus.44659.

Ebrahim AK, Wadachi R, Suda H. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of five different electronic apex locators for determining the working length of endodontically retreated teeth. Aust Endod J. 2007;33(1):7–12.

Aggarwal V, Singla M, Kabi D. An in vitro evaluation of performance of two electronic root canal length measurement devices during retreatment of different obturating materials. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1526-30.

Tufenkci P, Kalaycı A. Evaluation of the accuracy of different apex locators in determining the working length during root canal retreatment. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2020;14(2):125-9.

Al-Bulushi A, Levinkind M, Flanagan M, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. Effect of canal preparation and residual root filling material on root impedance. Int Endod J. 2008;41(10):892-904.

Uzun O, Topuz O, Tinaz C, Nekoofar MH, Dummer PM. Accuracy of two root canal length measurement devices integrated into rotary endodontic motors when removing gutta-percha from root-filled teeth. Int Endod J. 2008;41(9):725-32.

Cardoso IV, Silveira MPC, Vitali FC, Piasecki L, da Fonseca Roberti Garcia L, Bortoluzzi EA, et al. Evaluation of changes in root canal length and accuracy of the electronic apex locator during different stages of endodontic treatment and retreatment. Odontology. 2024;112(2):537-45.

Altenburger MJ, Cenik Y, Schirrmeister JF, Wrbas KT, Hellwig E. Combination of apex locator and endodontic motor for continuous length control during root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2009;42(4):368-74.

Grimberg F, Banegas G, Chiacchio L, Zmener O. In vivo determination of root canal length: a preliminary report using the Tri Auto ZX apex-locating handpiece. Int Endod J. 2002;35(7):590-3.

Topuz O, Uzun O, Tinaz AC, Bodrumlu E, Görgül G. Accuracy of two apex-locating handpieces in detecting simulated vertical and horizontal root fractures. J Endod. 2008;34(3):310-3.

Klemz AA, Cruz ATG, Piasecki L, Carneiro E, Westphalen VPD, da Silva Neto UX. Accuracy of electronic apical functions of a new integrated motor compared to the visual control of the working length-an ex vivo study. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(1):231-6.

Wigler R, Huber R, Lin S, Kaufman AY. Accuracy and reliability of working length determination by Gold Reciproc Motor in reciprocating movement. J Endod. 2014;40(5):694-7.

Vasconcelos BC, Frota LM, Souza Tde A, Bernardes RA, Duarte MA. Evaluation of the maintenance of the apical limit during instrumentation with hybrid equipment in rotary and reciprocating modes. J Endod. 2015;41(5):682-5.

Christofzik DW, Bartols A, Khaled M, Größner-Schreiber B, Dörfer CE. The accuracy of the auto-stop function of different endodontic devices in detecting the apical constriction. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):141.

Felippe WT, Felippe MC, Reyes Carmona J, Crozoé FC, Alvisi BB. Ex vivo evaluation of the ability of the ROOT ZX II to locate the apical foramen and to control the apical extent of rotary canal instrumentation. Int Endod J. 2008;41(6):502-7.

Piasecki L, Carneiro E, da Silva Neto UX, Westphalen VP, Brandão CG, Gambarini G, et al. The Use of Micro-Computed Tomography to Determine the Accuracy of 2 Electronic Apex Locators and Anatomic Variations Affecting Their Precision. J Endod. 2016;42(8):1263-7.

Duran-Sindreu F, Stöber E, Mercadé M, Vera J, Garcia M, Bueno R, et al. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro readings when testing the accuracy of the Root ZX apex locator. J Endod. 2012;38(2):236-9.

Chen E, Kaing S, Mohan H, Ting SY, Wu J, Parashos P. An ex vivo comparison of electronic apex locator teaching models. J Endod. 2011;37(8):1147-51.

Lipski M, Trąbska-Świstelnicka M, Woźniak K, Dembowska E, Droździk A. Evaluation of alginate as a substitute for root-surrounding tissues in electronic root canal measurements. Aust Endod J. 2013;39(3):155-8.

Baldi JV, Victorino FR, Bernardes RA, de Moraes IG, Bramante CM, Garcia RB, et al. Influence of embedding media on the assessment of electronic apex locators. J Endod. 2007;33(4):476-9.

ElAyouti A, Löst C. A simple mounting model for consistent determination of the accuracy and repeatability of apex locators. Int Endod J. 2006;39(2):108-12.

Farrell RE, Walley FL, Lukey AP, Germida JJ. Manual and digital line-intercept methods of measuring root length: a comparison. Agron J. 1993;85(6):1233–7.

Dutta K, Desai PD, Das UK, Sarkar S. Comparative evaluation of three methods to measure working length - Manual tactile sensation, digital radiograph, and multidetector computed tomography: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2017;20(2):76-80.

Marfisi K, Mercade M, Plotino G, Duran-Sindreu F, Bueno R, Roig M. Efficacy of three different rotary files to remove gutta-percha and Resilon from root canals. Int Endod J. 2010;43(11):1022-8.

Madhu K, Karade P, Chopade R, Jadhav Y, Chodankar K, Alane U. CBCT evaluation of gutta-percha removal using Protaper and Mtwo retreatment files, WaveOne, and Hedstrom files: an ex vivo study. Front Dent. 2021;18:19.

Wrbas KT, Ziegler AA, Altenburger MJ, Schirrmeister JF. In vivo comparison of working length determination with two electronic apex locators. Int Endod J. 2007;40(2):133-8.

Mancini M, Palopoli P, Iorio L, Conte G, Cianconi L. Accuracy of an electronic apex locator in the retreatment of teeth obturated with plastic or cross-linked gutta-percha carrier-based materials: an ex vivo study. J Endod. 2014;40(12):2061-5.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-15

How to Cite

1.
Saikaew P, Wimonchit S. Agreement and Reliability of An Endodontic Motor with Integrated Electronic Apex Locators During Gutta-Percha Retrieval: An Ex Vivo Comparative Study. SWU Dent J. [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 15 [cited 2026 Jun. 18];19(1):127-40. Available from: https://ejournals.swu.ac.th/index.php/swudentj/article/view/17432

Issue

Section

บทวิทยาการ (Original articles)

Categories