ผลการฝึกด้วยน้าหนักที่มีต่อความสามารถในทักษะกางเขนและหกขนาน THE EFFECT OF WEIGHT TRAINING UPON THE CROSS AND PLANCHE

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the effect of weight training upon the cross and planche.Methods The Purposively Selected were 16 gymnast Suphanburi Sports School, age between 13-15 years old. They were divided into 2 groups of 8 persons each. The first group received training upon the cross and planche ability along with muscular strength while the second group received training upon the cross and planche ability only.The training duration was 8 weeks, 3 days per week. The gymnast were tested with the cross and planche ability test, before training, and after training in the 4th and 8th week of training. The data were analyzed in terms of mean, standard deviation and Nonparametric Statistics.Results 1) Mean in the cross ability test of the controlled l group before the training and after training in the 4th and 8th week of training were 1.75,1.88, 2.25 ,and standard deviations were 0.70, 0.83, 0.88 respectively and the experimental group were 1.88, 2.25, 4.75 ,and standard deviations were 0.64, 0.46, 1.03 respectively 2) Mean in the planche ability test of the controlled group before the training and after training in the 4th and 8th week of training were 3.87, 4.25 ,4.88,and standard deviations were 0.64, 0.70, 0.64 respectively and the experimental group were 3.75, 4.50 ,6.50,and standard deviations were 0.70, 0.53, 0.75 respectively 3) When compared the cross and planche ability test between , before training, and after training in the 4th and 8th week of training means of the Controlled Group and the Experimental Group, were significantly different, at .05 levels. 4) When compared the cross ability test between the after 8 week of training means of the controlled Group and the experimental Group, were significantly different, at .05 levels.and. When compared the planche ability test between the 4th and 8th week of training means of the controlled Group and the experimental Group, were significantly different, at .05 levels.