Development of Learning Outcome with Problem Solving Teaching Method for Undergraduate Students of Faculty of Fine Arts, Srinakharinwirot University, in Music Theory Course, Interval Chapter
Authors
Sitsake Yanderm
Abstract
This research aims to measure up the learning outcome of music theory course, interval chapter, fromfirst-year undergraduates of Srinakharinwirot University. Employing common teaching method and problemsolving teaching method, the research is processed with simple random sampling by lottery from 32persons of first-year undergraduates of 2013 academic year. The sampling group is divided into twosixteen-person groups. Course’s pre-test and post-test is applied as tools of research to analysis for statisticvalues including mean, S.D., and t-test.The research shows learning outcome of the music theory course, interval chapter, from first-yearundergraduates with common teaching method and problem solving teaching method. Learning outcomeevaluation by pre-test and post-test is parted into five issues: writing key signature, writing intervalnote, accuracy of writing music notation signal, writing inversed interval, and accuracy of intervalclassification. Course’s post-test demonstrates differences of the two teaching method in every issue.For the common teaching method experimental group, the highest-scored issue is accuracy of writingmusic notation signal, = 14.40, S.D. = 1.21934; and the lowest-scored issue is writing inversed interval,= 12.45, S.D. = 1.23554. On the other hand, the highest-scored issue of accuracy of interval classification,= 18.80, S.D. = 1.21080; and the lowest-scored issue of writing key signature, = 17.24, S.D. =1.32410 are beaten by the problem solving teaching method experimental group. In overall post-testevaluation, the problem solving teaching method experimental group reaches higher scores than thecommon teaching method experimental group in all five issues with differences of post-test scores;statistical significant is set at 0.05.