Development of Learning Outcome with Problem Solving Teaching Method for Undergraduate Students of Faculty of Fine Arts, Srinakharinwirot University, in Music Theory Course, Interval Chapter

Authors

  • Sitsake Yanderm

Abstract

This research aims to measure up the learning outcome of music theory course, interval chapter, fromfirst-year undergraduates of Srinakharinwirot University. Employing common teaching method and problemsolving teaching method, the research is processed with simple random sampling by lottery from 32persons of first-year undergraduates of 2013 academic year. The sampling group is divided into twosixteen-person groups. Course’s pre-test and post-test is applied as tools of research to analysis for statisticvalues including mean, S.D., and t-test.The research shows learning outcome of the music theory course, interval chapter, from first-yearundergraduates with common teaching method and problem solving teaching method. Learning outcomeevaluation by pre-test and post-test is parted into five issues: writing key signature, writing intervalnote, accuracy of writing music notation signal, writing inversed interval, and accuracy of intervalclassification. Course’s post-test demonstrates differences of the two teaching method in every issue.For the common teaching method experimental group, the highest-scored issue is accuracy of writingmusic notation signal, = 14.40, S.D. = 1.21934; and the lowest-scored issue is writing inversed interval,= 12.45, S.D. = 1.23554. On the other hand, the highest-scored issue of accuracy of interval classification,= 18.80, S.D. = 1.21080; and the lowest-scored issue of writing key signature, = 17.24, S.D. =1.32410 are beaten by the problem solving teaching method experimental group. In overall post-testevaluation, the problem solving teaching method experimental group reaches higher scores than thecommon teaching method experimental group in all five issues with differences of post-test scores;statistical significant is set at 0.05.

Downloads